Yep, I'm doing it too. Bashing ol' Damien Hirst for being a sell out, commercialized, "bad art" artist. But I got to thinking.... isn't he just doing what we all really want to do? Make tons of money from his art? Well, actually I'd like the art to be worthwhile also, but that's another can of worms (or tank of sharks). As Fugitive Ink's blog puts it, it's opened up yet another dialogue about the commercial aspects of art, art as product, bad art, bad artists, and Robert Hughes weight. Of course the last item, Mr. Hughes' weight, is just as important according to some writers, as him (ahem) weighing in on the topic of Mr. Hirst's talent (or lack thereof).
So what does all this hoo haa mean to those of us slaving away in the trenches for our daily bread? Not a whole heck of a lot really. It has no bearing whatsoever for those of us still working in that, some would say, quaint, tradition of easel painting. Gee, and all this time I thought I was a revolutionary! What's your take?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
How to Extend Your Acrylic Paint with Gel - and save money!
Stretch Your Acrylic Paint with a Gel Extension and save money! Join me for a live hangout every week Wednesday at 4 pm PST on my YouTube...

-
From Picasso's Blue Period The Old Guitarist I work in series almost always. Why? Because I'm committed to making the best art ...
-
From the email bag: Helen asks, "I have a very basic question for you. I find it so difficult to assign warm and cool to colors,it sti...
-
There's a lot of information out there on the Internet highway, some good, some bad, some so-so. But I don't recall ever seeing The ...
No comments:
Post a Comment